Timing of Colonoscopy After Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Are We Looking Too Soon? Article

Full Text via DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182a228d1 PMID: 24104997 Web of Science: 000329923400009

Cited authors

  • Cone, M. M.; Beck, D. E.; Hicks, T. E.; Rea, J. D.; Whitlow, C. B.; Vargas, H. D.; Margolin, D. A.

Abstract

  • BACKGROUND: Based on current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, colonoscopic surveillance after colorectal cancer resection should begin at 1 year.; OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the incidence of cancer or advanced polyp detection rate was high enough to justify colonoscopy at 1 year.; DESIGN: The Ochsner Clinic Tumor Registry Database was queried for patients who underwent a segmental colectomy or proctectomy between 2002 and 2010. Patients who had a preoperative colonoscopy and at least 1 documented postoperative colonoscopy were included. We considered new cancer or polyps of 1cm as missed on the preoperative colonoscopy. Patients with an identified genetic trait causing a predisposition to colorectal cancer were excluded.; RESULTS: Five hundred twelve patients underwent resection, and 155 met our inclusion criteria. The average age was 64 years, and 53% patients were male. There were 32.9% with stage I disease, 35% with stage II disease, 27.1% with stage III disease, and 5.2% with stage IV disease. Of these patients, 52.2% had a right colectomy, 7.1% had a left colectomy, 16.8% had a sigmoid colectomy, 22% had a low anterior resection, and 1.3% had a transanal resection. The average time to first postoperative colonoscopy was 478 days (SD 283 days). Twenty-four patients had adenomatous polyps detected on their first surveillance colonoscopy, but only 5 (3.2%) polyps were 1cm, and there was no correlation between stage of cancer and finding a polyp. No new cancers were detected, but 3 (1.9%) had an anastomotic recurrence.; CONCLUSIONS: The performance of surveillance colonoscopy at 1 year resulted in the detection of only 5 missed polyps 1cm and no metachronous cancers. Anastomotic recurrences were rare, and the majority were in patients who had rectal cancer that could be evaluated by in-office flexible sigmoidoscopy. Extending the time to first colonoscopy appears to be safe and would help conserve valuable resources, including physician and facility time, which is imperative in the current health care climate.

Authors

Publication date

  • 2013

Published in

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0012-3706

Start page

  • 1233

End page

  • 1236

Volume

  • 56

Issue

  • 11